Let’s say a compliance platform cost $12,000 annually. Is that expensive?
The answer will depend on the product it replaces.
If technology can eliminate hundreds of hours tedious evidence collection in a complex technology system, $12,000 might be a wise investment. The math would be different when a team of seven people could collect similar evidence in only one or two minutes per month.
It’s an effective way to start the look for Vanta. The question of which platform offers the most advanced features isn’t the only thing to consider. Ask what those features will help your business save time and work.
Automated Manufacturing has an Break-Even Point
Automation of compliance isn’t always beneficial or harmful. Scale changes its value. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company that has hundreds of employees many cloud environments, multiple applications, and constant access changes. Gathering evidence manually could become a major administrative burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and gather evidence can easily justify the expense.
Consider a startup with 10 employees that is preparing for its initial SOC 2. The infrastructure could be compact, and evidence collection may be manageable without extensive automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. Although a sophisticated platform may have a lot of features however, they’re only useful only when an organization is in need of them.
Compare Architecture not just Brands
Vanta Vs Drata is a debate which can be easily a feature-by-feature test. Both are reputable systems for compliance built around automation and integrations. As such, looking at their supported frameworks including integrations, service agreements, and individual quotes can be useful for organizations seeking that approach.
But there’s still another decision you’ll need to make. Does your business have an interest in an integration-driven platform for compliance? Some businesses want automated evidence collection as well as continuous monitoring. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors aren’t all following the same model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. On the market, there are platforms with a simpler design that focus more on the organization of systems rather than connectivity.
CertAssist belongs to the latter category. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors, compliance consultants, as well as other experts, organizes controls frameworks in a central place. It offers editable policies and guidance for the auditing process, and allows auditors to view evidence through read-only access.
It does not connect to operational systems, nor does it create infrastructure agents. Customers upload their own evidence.
The System Access consideration in the Decision
Eliminating integrations has a distinct drawback: you have to gather evidence by hand.
It also removes the need for integration setup and also means that the application does not require constant connections to the operational environment.
Both architectures are equally excellent. It is crucial to determine what choices make sense for your company.
CertAssist is geared towards teams of between five and 200 people and publishes its prices rather than needing a sales conversation to obtain the beginning price. The starting price is $225 per month, which compares to the regular price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Earn Its Place
What a start-up with 10 employees needs today may not be the same for 500 or 100 employees.
A simple platform could make sense, while compliance is easy. As the amount of systems, employees frameworks, and evidence requirements grow, the economics will eventually favor greater automation. It’s a more efficient way to buy compliance software to let complexity earn its rightful place.
Do not pay for 50 integrations merely because they appear attractive on a comparison chart. They’re worth it to perform the tasks they are replacing is more costly as compared to manually performing them.